|
|
|
Arundel and South Downs
|
|
gain
from Conservative
|
|
NEW SEAT
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
27,251 (53.1%)
|
|
9,376 (18.3%)
|
|
13,216 (25.7%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
1,494 ( 2.9%)
|
|
|
|
67,641
|
|
51,337 (75.9%)
|
|
NEW SEAT
|
|
NEW SEAT
|
|
20,016 (37.7%)
|
|
33,365 (62.8%)
|
|
4,957 ( 9.3%)
|
|
13,349 (25.1%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
1,464 ( 2.8%)
|
|
|
Conservative
|
|
65,056
|
|
53,135 (81.7%)
|
|
|
-9.7%
|
|
+8.9%
|
|
+0.6%
|
|
+0.0%
|
|
+0.2%
|
|
+4.0%
|
|
-5.8%
|
|
|
|
There are no towns with more than 10,000 souls in the newly created West Sussex seat of Arundel and South Downs. A network of affluent, middle-class and comfortable small towns and villages, including Arundel, seat of the Duke of Norfolk, creates just about as safe as Conservative seat as is possible. This has created a secure base for a Conservative parliamentary career, unless a future boundary review expunges it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
13.87
|
9.03
|
154
|
|
|
17,226
|
47.08
|
11.17
|
422
|
|
|
2,959
|
8.09
|
11.25
|
72
|
|
|
2,469
|
6.75
|
14.70
|
46
|
|
|
0
|
0.00
|
10.45
|
0
|
|
|
2,768
|
7.57
|
2.81
|
269
|
|
|
1,530
|
4.18
|
8.01
|
52
|
|
|
2,959
|
8.09
|
15.25
|
53
|
|
|
657
|
1.80
|
7.13
|
25
|
|
|
554
|
1.51
|
10.17
|
15
|
|
|
