|
|
|
Wimbledon
|
|
gain
from Conservative
|
|
Charles Goodson-Wickes
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
17,694 (36.6%)
|
|
20,674 (42.8%)
|
|
8,014 (16.6%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
1,972 ( 4.1%)
|
|
|
|
64,070
|
|
48,354 (75.5%)
|
|
Charles Goodson-Wickes
|
|
Wimbledon
|
|
14,761 (29.7%)
|
|
26,331 (53.0%)
|
|
11,570 (23.3%)
|
|
10,569 (21.3%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
1,211 ( 2.4%)
|
|
|
Conservative
|
|
60,633
|
|
49,681 (81.9%)
|
|
|
-16.4%
|
|
+19.5%
|
|
-4.7%
|
|
+0.0%
|
|
+1.6%
|
|
+5.7%
|
|
-6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
One of the most affluent parts of Greater London, Wimbledon is best known nationally and internationally for its tennis tournament. Unsurprisingly, this well-heeled seat is securely Tory, returning incumbent Charles Goodson-Wickes in 1992 with over half of the total vote, leaving Labour and the Lib Dems to split the rest fifty-fifty. Those opposition votes came from the 'other' Wimbledon to the north, which is working-class with significant non-white minorities. For all the opposition's efforts, however, this should be an easy victory for the Conservatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,634
|
15.21
|
9.03
|
168
|
|
|
278
|
0.75
|
11.17
|
7
|
|
|
6,827
|
18.43
|
11.25
|
164
|
|
|
0
|
0.00
|
14.70
|
0
|
|
|
20,462
|
55.25
|
10.45
|
529
|
|
|
0
|
0.00
|
2.81
|
0
|
|
|
1,032
|
2.79
|
8.01
|
35
|
|
|
511
|
1.38
|
15.25
|
9
|
|
|
484
|
1.31
|
7.13
|
18
|
|
|
1,541
|
4.16
|
10.17
|
41
|
|
|
