|
|
|
Woking
|
|
gain
from Conservative
|
|
Sir Cranley Onslow (Retiring)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
19,553 (38.4%)
|
|
10,695 (21.0%)
|
|
13,875 (27.3%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
6,791 (13.3%)
|
|
|
|
70,053
|
|
50,914 (72.7%)
|
|
Sir Cranley Onslow (Retiring)
|
|
Woking
|
|
17,731 (32.0%)
|
|
32,718 (59.1%)
|
|
7,398 (13.4%)
|
|
14,987 (27.1%)
|
|
0 ( 0.0%)
|
|
257 ( 0.5%)
|
|
|
Conservative
|
|
69,318
|
|
55,360 (79.9%)
|
|
|
-20.7%
|
|
+7.6%
|
|
+0.2%
|
|
+0.0%
|
|
+12.9%
|
|
+1.1%
|
|
-7.2%
|
|
|
|
This, the largest town in Surrey, has been slimmed down to its urban core in the latest boundary review, which causes no problems for the incumbent Conservatives - if anything, Woking's shade of blue has deepened. The main threat is from the Lib Dems, and that in local elections. Dissenting voices will be heard from Woking's working-class terraces and council estates, but overall this is a plum Tory seat for new candidate Humfrey Mullins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,775
|
25.03
|
9.03
|
277
|
|
|
3,613
|
9.25
|
11.17
|
83
|
|
|
4,106
|
10.51
|
11.25
|
93
|
|
|
9,464
|
24.23
|
14.70
|
165
|
|
|
4,790
|
12.26
|
10.45
|
117
|
|
|
0
|
0.00
|
2.81
|
0
|
|
|
3,760
|
9.63
|
8.01
|
120
|
|
|
2,315
|
5.93
|
15.25
|
39
|
|
|
324
|
0.83
|
7.13
|
12
|
|
|
772
|
1.98
|
10.17
|
19
|
|
|
